This is a discussion on "I'm worried about the fuel reaching the rear ports" within the Technical Questions forums. This forum, and the thread "I'm worried about the fuel reaching the rear ports "are both part of the General Performance category;
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Alcohol Holic Year: 1999 Make: Daihatsu Model: Move | IF fuel is the same for all cylinders, and the farthest gets the least air, then the farthest will be the richest. SInce the meth is delivered with the air, you will also get the least meth to the farthest cylinder, more fuel and less air = rich Direct port is more for cylinder cooling than charge cooling. there is a guy on the aquamist board with 8 nozzles on a 6 cylinder, pre turbo, pre TB, and Direct port. IF you have a turbo in the eff. island and a big IC, then the CC cooling may be more important than cooling a relatively cool charge.
__________________ 1999 Daihatsu Move 660cc's of pure boredom DO Progressive going on soon. |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Water Injection Newb Year: 2001 Make: Toyota Model: Turbo Tacoma Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 8
|
I see what you're saying now, that was what I was saying earlier. The intercooler is working very efficiantly. I'm more worried about combustion chamber cooling, raising the octane and lowering the EGT's than cooling the intake air.
|
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Alcohol Injection Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 48
|
Direct port is not needed. If you were really concerned about it you could tap 1 small D01 nozzle in the aft portion of the intake facing forward. As well as your D04/M04 in the uppipe. IMO you don't need to worry about it. If you had an inline 6 then maybe.... I would just use the single and plumb it 6" or so down stream of the TB. |
| | |